Welcome to the Bug Tracking System for the DUNE project.
Due to increasing spam attacks, we had to disable the feature of anonymous bug reports. You will have to register before you are able to report a new bug.
In case you experience any problems, let us know at http://www.dune-project.org/mailinglists.html .
Due to increasing spam attacks, we had to disable the feature of anonymous bug reports. You will have to register before you are able to report a new bug.
In case you experience any problems, let us know at http://www.dune-project.org/mailinglists.html .
FS#370 - Implement the GridFactory for OneDGrid
Attached to Project:
Dune
Opened by Oliver Sander (sander) - Monday, 31 March 2008, 21:09 GMT+2
Last edited by Oliver Sander (sander) - Sunday, 14 March 2010, 22:57 GMT+2
Opened by Oliver Sander (sander) - Monday, 31 March 2008, 21:09 GMT+2
Last edited by Oliver Sander (sander) - Sunday, 14 March 2010, 22:57 GMT+2
|
DetailsOneDGrid is an unstructured grid and should have a specialization of the GridFactory class.
|
This task blocks these from closing
Closed by Oliver Sander (sander)
Sunday, 14 March 2010, 22:57 GMT+2
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: In dune-grid revision 6441
Sunday, 14 March 2010, 22:57 GMT+2
Reason for closing: Implemented
Additional comments about closing: In dune-grid revision 6441
Comment by Oliver Sander (sander) -
Thursday, 04 June 2009, 15:07 GMT+2
- Field changed: Percent Complete (0% → 70%)
The factory exists as of revision 5229, but the handling of indices is not correct, yet.
Comment by Christian Engwer (christi) -
Friday, 12 March 2010, 07:45 GMT+2
Will this be fixed? Otherwise add an entry to the known issues in the release notes.
Comment by Oliver Sander (sander) -
Friday, 12 March 2010, 10:35 GMT+2
I'll try to get this fixed over the week-end. If not I'll add the note.
Comment by Oliver Sander (sander) -
Saturday, 13 March 2010, 20:13 GMT+2
Element and vertex indices are correct (== in insertion order) now. This should be enough for the 2.0 release. Numbering of boundary segments is still missing.
Comment by Oliver Sander (sander) -
Sunday, 14 March 2010, 22:57 GMT+2
As of revision 6441, the numbering of boundary segments is also correct.